1.0 Background 1.1 A Concept Paper on the “Taxation of Services Based on a Negative List” was circulated on August 31, 2011 to seek feedback from all stakeholders. Many chambers, service providers’ associations, professional institutes, business entities and individuals have provided valuable inputs.
1.2 The feedback received indicates an overwhelming support for the taxation of services based on a Negative List. It has been mentioned that a long positive list is neither conducive from the point of tax administration nor tax compliance and adds to legal disputes.
1.3 As to the timing for the introduction of the Negative List, the opinion is divided. While some feel that it should be introduced at the time of GST, with a wider Constitutional mandate, there are others who feel that the introduction of Negative List should be done independently of the GST. In fact, it has been added that such introduction at an earlier stage will pave the way for the smooth transition to the GST, and significantly ease the challenges arising out of implementing the GST. It has been further stated that the issues relating to some transactions being considered services by the Central Government and goods or luxury or entertainment by some of the State Governments are independent of the issue whether the taxation is based on positive or negative list.
1.4 Many suggestions have been made on the contents of the negative list also. This revised Concept Paper has been drafted to consider all the relevant issues that may arise if the Negative List is to be introduced either under the existing regime of taxation or at the time of GST.
2. Definition of Service and Taxability
2.1 The earlier Paper had given the definition of service to “mean anything which does not constitute supply of goods, money or immovable property” A number of specific inclusions or exclusions were further elaborated. Suggestions have been made that the “service” should be confined to economic transactions or transactions for consideration. These suggestions have arisen primarily because the provisions relating to charging section were not indicated in the earlier Paper. Taking note of all the various considerations, it is felt that the definition of “service” need not be revised in any manner and retained.
2.2 However the essence of the suggestions can be captured in the charging section somewhat as follows:
“There shall be levied a tax (hereinafter referred to as service tax) at the rate of ... per cent of the value of services provided or to be provided by a taxable person to another person and collected in such manner as may be prescribed.”
2.3 The above charging section is illustrative in terms of the present scheme of taxation and the same will naturally look quite different if the negative list is introduced alongwith the GST, capturing all the various activities that will be brought within the purview of the GST.
2.4 Taxable person may be defined as: “any person who independently carries out any economic activity, whether or not for a pecuniary profit”.
2.5 Thus the impact of all the proposed charging section will be to confine taxation to transactions in services carried out with another person by a person engaged in an economic activity on his own account.
2.6 A taxable person will not include wage earners as employees or others under a contract to their employers while acting in that capacity as they do not carry out economic activities independently but only on behalf of the organization they work for. This will also exclude members of legislatures likewise, which were covered by a specific exclusion in the previous Concept Paper. It is further clarified that this will apply only in so far as employees are bound to an employer by a contract of employment or by any other legal arrangement creating that relationship. It will in no case stretch to services rendered beyond the demand of the contractual arrangement. Thus an employee agreeing to serve after normal office hours against additional remuneration in terms of another arrangement beyond the terms of employment will not be construed as working in the said contractual relationship e.g. a teacher taking private tuition classes while the additional charges may be paid by the school from the amounts so collected from the students.
2.7 Economic activities ar e such activities as are carried out for consideration, whether or not the consideration is adequate or provided by the recipient of the service, or leads to profit at the end of a period. The taxable activities will thus exclude transactions carried out free of charge or gratis, without any direct or indirect commercial advantage, or as recreation or hobby. Statutory fines and penalties will also not constitute “economic activities”. However, commercial demurrages, by whatever name called, for extended use of a service will be taxable.
Moreover the presence of profit motive is not necessary while carrying out economic activity. Thus the activities of political parties, religious bodies, in so far as they carry out religious activities, decorations and awards for excellence and not as reward in lieu of recognition for services rendered, will fall outside the charging section.
2.8 It is further clarified that by virtue of Article 366 of the constitution certain supplies are deemed to be supply of goods. They will thus be excluded from the definition of “service” but only to the extent of the value of goods.
2.9 As stated in the previous Paper, having regard to its characteristics and with a view to remove any ambiguity, the Central Government shall have powers to declare an activity as a provision of service or otherwise and such activity, notwithstanding anything to the contrary, be considered as a provision of service. The inclusions and exclusions given under the definition of service in the earlier Concept Paper can be clarified under this provision and need not form a part of the main definition.
3.0 Negative List of Services
3.1 The revised Negative List of services is given in the Annexure.
3.2 A number of deletions have been made from the previous Paper and are as follows:
3.3Many other valuable suggestions have been incorporated and are as follows:
4.0 Place of Taxation Rules
4.1 In order to operationalize the Negative List, it will be necessary to move towards Place of Taxation/Supply Rules that will determine the principles for the determination of location at which services shall be deemed to be provided. These are also intended to be released for public debate shortly.
(This Revised Concept Paper is placed in the public domain for the widest possible consultation, extensive debate and to seek views and feedback of all stakeholders. Views expressed here do not reflect the position of the Government of India in any manner. Any comments, suggestions or feedback may be given by December 15, 2011 )to Shri Shobhit Jain, OSD (TRU) at email@example.com, Tel: 011-23095590; Fax: 011-23093037)